Reply to Is Cornell really still the "worst" ivy?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Is Cornell really still the "worst" ivy?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]With Cornell consistently ranking above Brown and Dartmouth in the USNews rankings isn't it safe to say that Cornell is a middle ivy now? Also Cornell is extremely strong in STEM which will continue to grow as the primary basis for university reputation across the world. Also given a lot of the bad press around Columbia I would say the tiers now are:

Tier 1: HYP
Tier 2: Penn, Cornell 
Tier 3: Columbia
Tier 4: Brown, Dartmouth

DD/friends anecdotally say the USN rankings in the last couple of years have changed things and they refer to Cornell as a T10, while Brown and Dartmouth are considered just OK T20s.[/quote]

Why do we persist this nonsense? The Ivy league is a sports conference, nothing more. It has also become the lazy man's way to identify a group of very selective schools. It is a group of eight very different universities all excellent and none generally better than another group of 8-12 universities who are also extremely selective but not part of the athletic conference. For undergraduate education they are also no better than the top dozen or so SLACs (engineering and CS excepted).

Brown and Dartmouth are more like Wesleyan and Middlebury than Cornell. Cornell is closer to UCB and UMich than Columbia except in student experience. The idea that these schools should be grouped together is actually a ludicrous idea, almost as ludicrous as the idea that you can actually stack rank these schools alone or within the larger pool of schools which are complete peers of any of the Ivy league schools. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics