Reply to Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No Vance fan, but if you listen to the entire podcast, it’s clear the host is saying the [b]“biological” value of Post-Menopausal women.[/b]  He notes that no other mamels have menopause.  So what’s the evolutionary value?  They also discuss how our modern economy values paid work way more than kin work.  Is that right?  Should we value caregiving roles more?  If so, what’s the policy answer to that?  Interesting questions- I’m glad these issues are in the public forum, I wish we were talking about the issues rather than ranting about what JD did or did not say on a years old podcast.[/quote]

First of all, this is wrong. [url]https://www.nwf.org/Home/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2024/Winter/Animals/Mammals-Human-Menopause[/url]

Second of all, what a classically male assumption that once women aren't sexually useful then they must be useful to men in some other way. Perhaps when men can no longer sexually function they can also be relieved of their utility in the corporate or public sphere and be directed to serve the greater good in some way?

This is rank misogyny, nothing more, nothing less. But I don't think I need to actually tell PP that - he knows. Hiding behind the biology argument is a huge tell.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics