Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "UVA just offered spots to 57 people on its wait-list."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]UVA was not our backup, but we did pick William and Mary over UVA.[/quote] smart decision, it's a private ivy-like education for a public school price.[/quote] The sad thing about William & Mary is its free fall in the rankings. It's not even a Top 50 school anymore.[/quote] W&M might as well be an all female school at this point.[/quote] W&M is 41%/59% M/F. UVA is 43%/57% M/F. National is about 40%/60 M/F.[/quote] Where the heck are the boys!?[/quote] Wherever they are, probably not studying.[/quote] Why would you say that? How bizarre. DP[/quote] I think because there are now 3 women for every 2 men at college. [/quote] Why wouldn’t they admit more men by a huge margin to try and get the balance correct? It creates a weird hook up culture in college.[/quote] There are simply many more qualified and applying women in the U.S. than men now. 60/40 nationally. [/quote] The past 20 years of 'bring your daughter to work', girls on the run, girls in STEM and every other conceivable program aimed solely at the girls, combined with the feminization of the American education system has promoted women and we see that result. Laura Bush saw the boys falling behind and aimed reading groups at them--but pretty much fell on deaf ears. The boys fell behind as the girls rose. However, in upper socioeconomic groups you do not see this disparity. The boys of UMC/rich do just as well in school. They had parents looking out for them. Poor boys and boys of lower MC were just labeled as problems in K and treated differently.[/quote] It is going to be a real problem in coming years, decades when women are looking for a comparable mate to raise a family. It's like in Indian/China when they got rid of the females and then realized there aren't any 'mates' for the men.[/quote] Someone on another thread suggested that due to the influx of male illegal immigrants, the educated women in the US may end up marrying one of these guys.[/quote] HA. yeah, right. Never going to happen. UMC/rich girls aren't going to marry day laborers and mini mart operators. [/quote] Unless they think it's trendy or they want to rebellious against their parents. But I also imagine that a lot of these illegal immigrants may be very motivated to better their status in life (and the Biden administration is currently giving them every opportunity). Personally, I got a son that epitomizes the problem with a lot of boys these days - too much video game playing. He would rather play video than even hang out with his girlfriend (in fact, I am shocked that he even has a girlfriend, but the relationship is pretty much the girlfriend doing all the work). [/quote] My 16 and 18 year old go outside. Play at the field. Meet to play hoops. We have limited electronic use as hard as that road is—computer/phones plugged in in kitchen before bed, Xbox time limits etc. Taking Tik tok off phone. It made a big difference in interpersonal relationships, looking people in the eye, communication, etc. I agree —boys have addictive personalities and these companies/apps are designed ti get them hooked [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics