Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Big Law - HR meeting out of the blue "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is op. This SUCKS. Im feeling defeated and depressed and imposter syndrome is eating me alive. The pip made no reference to a severance package and nothing was discussed about it. I think the posters who said it’s a 60 day runway and then they will talk to you about severance are wrong, I think this 60 day window is the severance period basically. [/quote] I would be really surprised if there is no severance because the 3 months paid six months on website is market rate for large firms. Maybe that drops off in the amlaw 100-200 range and maybe in the bottom of that amlaw 100 range. Even my cheap firm with pay compression gave that severance.[/quote] This. Also putting OP on a PIP means that they will expect SOME work to be done during those 60 days. While they are signaling loud & clear you won't have a long-term future at the firm, it's nothing like the 3 months paid severance/6 months on the website deal where no work will be done during that time frame. Further, the 3 months severance is often paid biweekly like a normal paycheck. If you take a job at a competing firm immediately, then they stop paying you due to the conflict-of-interest (can't be paid by two firms at once). I know a number of Big Law associates who were laid off like this in the past year. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics