Reply to Perry v Segura

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Perry v Segura"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Turnout in Loudoun was not that high.  I don't know why that particular site has that number.  It's 29% here, which seems much more plausible.  https://eresultslive.com/Virginia/Loudoun/results/[/quote]

That one site is off. That's not an accurate number at all.

Women's rights FTW tonight. [/quote]
+1 We had a 93% voter turnout.

https://enr.elections.virginia.gov/results/public/LOUDOUNCOUNTY/elections/2023-Nov-Gen[/quote]

No, that’s the site that’s wrong. Please stop promoting it. Voter turnout is never ever that high. 50% would be crazy high. That site is incorrect. [/quote]
You think the state election site is wrong? [/quote]

Yes, and now they have fixed it. The ignorance is astounding. Even 46% turnout in a year with no pres/senate/house/gov on the ballot is shockingly good. [/quote]
Ok so now you are ok with the site because the data has been updated after all polling sites are in. So no need for hysterics around the linking of a state election site.[/quote]

I’m not hysterical. I just couldn’t believe how many people blindly believed there was a 93-99% turnout without question. That lack of general knowledge around elections is so frightening. Everyone should have immediately known that was an error.

2020 was record breaking voter turnout and it was 66%.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/voter-turnout-2018-2022/[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics