Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "SVB failure "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ok bear with me here. This is why the FRB needs a union, pronto. We don’t know why supervision failed here, but it did. We know historically (and I know personally) that retaliation against bank examiners happens. I’ll bet anything that there were FRB examiners trying to raise alarm bells who were silenced, either directly or due to a culture of fear/retaliation. A union will help ensure examiners can speak freely and press their concerns forward. [/quote] FRBSF is a disaster right now. They had FTX/Moonstone, Silvergate, and now SVB on their watch. I believe a number of SVB execs are FRBSF alums. A union starts to make sense if there are legit complaints of retaliation and silencing. But I bet the banks & Congress would fight it tooth & nail. Is there a statutory ban on a union within the FRS?[/quote] Absolutely no ban that I know of. There is a strong federal policy right now in favor of federal unions. And of course we need much stronger revolving door rules, like a 5-year ban. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics