Reply to Atheism’s sexual misconduct problem

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Atheism’s sexual misconduct problem "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Maybe it’s time to recap the majority atheist response on this thread.

1. Dawkins may have sold millions of books and delivered hundreds of lectures, but he lectures to people directly instead of through an organization so his support for pedophilia isn’t my problem.

2. Harris and Silverman: crickets

3. NAMBLA—the only case any of you feel comfortable talking about

4. I wanna talk about the Catholic Church instead of atheist abusers! Talking about atheist abusers makes widdle me uncomfortable! Waaaaahhhh![/quote]

1) Dawkins is not an atheist abuser because he was never accused of anything. Not sure what you are talking about. He also is not the head of an atheist organization.

2. Did they molested anyone?

3. Are there any documented cases of nambla members molesting anyone? Can you provide that information? If so, close the organization. If not, atheists still disavow it. It’s gross. Just because the person who started it was atheist does not make it some kind of atheist church.

4. I provided you many verified instances of millions of children being molested by church’s. You did not provide a single example of an atheist molestation, and we are all still waiting. You talk fluff but have not provided anything.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics