Reply to APS Outdoor Lunch Needs to Be Optional

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "APS Outdoor Lunch Needs to Be Optional"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honey, things aren't normal in a pandemic. You need to figure out a way to deal with that. Please get therapy if this is a hard concept for you to handle. [/quote]

"in a pandemic" - but kids are having normal lunches in many places in the US and Europe.  So it's not "because of the pandemic" - we have people using our kids to chase Zero COVID, which is scientifically not possible.[/quote]

I myself are for letting Omicron rip - otherwise, we'll be doing these restrictions for the next 5 to 10 years. Everyone will be exposed to COVID repeatedly in their life, it's never going away, and delaying your exposure to it means your increasing your risk, considering the steep age stratification with COVID complications.

I know many parents are doing the "let it rip" strategy outside of school now. The COVIDians can put their kids in their blue K94 masks, keep their kids locked away and cause them mental problems, only to delay the inevitable.  We're done.[/quote]
Do you realize that many adults--including vaccinated adults--feel shitty for a solid week or two when they get COVID?  Sure, some are asymptomatic, but many breakthrough cases are comparable to a bad flu.   I wouldn't ignore a flu outbreak in a school just because I got a flu shot, and for the same reason I wouldn't ignore a COVID outbreak.  I don't want to spend my holiday break isolated and sick, nor do I want to burn through two weeks of my PTO being sick in February.  Being sick sucks.  Let's not "let it rip."  That sounds insanely stupid.  I'm not COVID anxious at all, but common sense measures to help keep people healthy and avoid huge outbreaks should remain in place.  [/quote]

+1.  Not to mention, but the severity of the disease is related to exposure and viral load.  Removing protections won't just increase the number of cases, but also the severity of cases.  And it's not like you only get covid once.  You can get sick again every six months to a year.[/quote]

Everyone is getting COVID eventually.  But instead of getting it when you're younger and more immune, you'd prefer to worthlessly spend years of life trying to avoid it. However, COVID gets more dangerous the more you age.  Make 0 sense.  The only way this "strategy" makes sense is if you think COVID will be eradicated, which no mainstream scientist thinks at all.

Getting infected is one of the best immunities you can get. Yes, you can get reinfected just like any other coronavirus, but the symptoms are much more likely to be not serious.

More importantly, infection-based immunity is one of the best you can get.  See the latest data out of Israel.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/MSmelkinsonPhD/status/1468048748244877312?s=20[/twitter]

[/quote][/quote]

[fixing formatting, sorry]
Any theories on why the Israeli study's data leads to the opposite conclusion as NIH/CDC studies (re: efficacy of natural immunity vs. vaccine-induced immunity)?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics