Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I will never forget the case that changed Ireland's views on abortion and it was less than 10 years ago. I just remember it was a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant. Something came up later in the pregnancy and the only way she was going to survive was to have an abortion. Being Ireland, she couldn't get it. She did die week later, and of course the fetus died too. How many times will the US go through things like that to decide "yeah, perhaps an abortion is needed more in the medical sense than we thought".[/quote]
It’s going to take women being honest about what happened to them. Sadly, that means they’re going to get nothing but judgment and threats. The one woman I know who had an abortion in her second trimester did so because she was going to die of blood loss before her fetus reached viability, but she didn’t talk about her abortion, she just “lost” the baby. I understand why she didn’t want to open herself and her story up to scorn from her Catholic relatives (has there been another religion that has caused as much misery to the world?), but her very, very necessary abortion became a miscarriage in the telling. [/quote]

This is such a great point. I wonder how many conservative, Christian women lie about “losing” their baby? I bet it’s a lot. But, of course, that isn’t a “real abortion.” When, in fact, they are actually aborting to save their own lives.

When it starts affecting the Millennial-age daughters of white conservatives, that’s when this sh#tshow will explode.[/quote]
PP you’re replying to. I bet it’s a lot, too. In her defense, the woman I’m talking about actually is pro-choice and votes accordingly, she just didn’t want to deal with scorn or even just criticism along with mourning the loss of the pregnancy she and her husband wanted very much.

But that’s it, isn’t it? These second and third trimester abortions are [i]wanted[/i] pregnancies. They had no urgency to abort earlier because they [i]wanted[/i] to have a child, so it is layers of cruelty upon cruelty to force women to carry doomed pregnancies, and all because Republicans hate women in their very marrow.

White women better begin voting pro-choice as their number issue, because at the end of the day, the GOP does not see them as human. I don’t know what it’s going to take for them to understand that their “loving” GOP husbands and “open minded” political party would just as soon crush them under their identity politics of hate against women. You female GOP voters are dirt in your party and you [i]still[/i] don’t get it. You think you’ll be protected. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics