Reply to 75,000 Pro-Gun Demonstrators in Richmond For "Lobby Day"?

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "75,000 Pro-Gun Demonstrators in Richmond For "Lobby Day"?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I respect the decisions of others who chose not to have guns. I am simply pointing out that I have the right to own guns as long as I am not violating the rights of others.

I support mandatory background checks, training requirements, and registration. But gun bans based on superficial feature specification is stupid. [/quote]

What about gat cranks and high-capacity magazines? 
[/quote]

Gat cranks, and other similar features 1) effectively bypass existing laws limiting automatic weapons and 2) have secondary safety concerns due to the work-around nature of their design. Gat cranks and bump stocks are therefore not superficial features. High capacity magazines is somewhere in the middle in my mind. I believe the very design of the semi-auto mechanism is limitation enough and that any further limits on magazine size is superficial until it starts to become a de facto ban on semi-auto weapons. And at that point, the argument is not about magazine size, but rather about semi-auto versus bolt-action rifles. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics