Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]If someone has time to dig into them, there's good data in these fact sheets, although they are from 2015-16 and 2016-17. https://dme.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dm...20Fact%20%20Sheet_10.06.17.pdf https://dme.dc.gov/node/1198445 Also, at risk of academic failure is a designation DC has only begun using in the last 2 years, so any comparison going further back isn't valid. Before that it was economically disadvantaged; before that FARMS, which only captures income. [b]At-risk is a narrower definition and fewer students meet this criterion (very poor, homeless, in foster care or at least one year behind the expected grade for your age) that meet the economically disadvantaged criterion.[/b][/quote] What was the impetus for shifting from the FARMs designation to the narrower "at risk" category? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
