Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm sorry - dont really know how to interpret the above or what point you're making. Not being snide - just dont understand what any of this data with such small samples proves.[/quote] When Latin was majority black and also has a bigger percentage of poor kids, it’s poor and black students were testing as proficient or advanced at almost twice the rate as they are now. So it isn’t the classical curriculum. What has changed?[/quote] Maybe who the black kids were, maybe being in a larger group. I'm thinking this is why Latin wanted to get back to majority minority. Honestly tho, is the current AA middle school pop even large enough to sample in a meaningful way? At some pt you are talking about individuals not groups.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
