Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "Did you redshirt your August girl? Why or why not?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Reading these threads, I really wonder whether it's the kids who are not "ready" to start school or whether it's that the parents aren't ready to send the kids. Some of the examples given as reasons for redshirting are ridiculous - sports, camp, dealing with mean girls, worries about whether 10 years down the road she'll be able to handle high school boys. If you think being the youngest is going to be a challenge for your kid - so what? That's not necessarily a bad thing. Why not help your kid rise to the occasion by giving them skills to handle different kinds of environments? And guess what? Your kids will be just fine even if they're the last ones in their friend group to get their driver's license, or they start high school at age 14, or they don't turn 18 until just before starting college. [/quote] DP. I sent my September birthday DS on time, as did several of my friends. Others held their August/September birthday DCs back a year. All of the on-time kids struggled, including mine, for years. All of the held-back kids did not struggle, in K or 1st or 2nd. You can laugh off kindergarten if you like. [b]From firsthand experience, I now know that it's developmentally inappropriate.[/b] [/quote] I think this is a faulty conclusion based on what you've presented. What do you mean by "struggled?" That they had to work really hard? That things didn't come easy to them? Being challenged is not a bad thing in and of itself.[/quote] Not pp, but for me “struggled”=Lots of crying, meltdowns, behavior problems, getting in trouble with teacher/being disliked by teacher, not wanting to do schoolwork, “hating school,” no friendships. I mean, could it all strengthen his character in the long run? Maybe. But it isn’t just “having to work really hard” on an academic sense.[/quote]This was my experience with my immature 5 yo. She went from a perfectly happy kid in August to one giant melt down once K started. It's February and she's still "adjusting." She's also reading level J. The hard part isn't academics at all.[/quote] That sounds like a lot. One thing I don't understand, though, is why parents often seem to jump to redshirting as a panacea for these things. If really having a hard time sitting still or getting in trouble in class, I'd be thinking about having the child evaluated for ADHD* etc. down the road. If anxiety, I'd look into treatment for the anxiety, since an early anxiety disorder won't necessarily resolve just by holding a kid back. If your child is really struggling, why not investigate other possible causes? Why assume redshirting would have "fixed" the problems your child is experiencing? *One concern I have about the studies that have shown higher rates of ADHD being diagnosed in younger kids is possible *under* diagnosis in older kids. It seems like more false negatives among the older kids is just as likely as false positives of ADHD among the younger kids. If your kid is older, they may be able to compensate for their attentional/behavioral problems, and hide them better than younger kids, therefore teachers miss the diagnosis. Just some thoughts.[/quote] We do both. Why would you assume we don’t? At age 5 or 6 a lot of diagnoses are still being teased out—there are rarely “panaceas” (unfortunately). Also, teachers don’t diagnose ADHD. It doesn’t sound like you have much experience with it.[/quote] I have a kid with adhd and I think the PP is right. Where does PP say a teacher would diagnose adhd? I don’t see that. [/quote] In the paragraph at the end that doesn’t make much sense to me: that older kids are under diagnosed because “teachers miss the diagnosis”[/quote] PP here, and I mispoke by "miss the diagnosis." I was rushing between mtgs and meant to indicate that it's possible that the teachers may not notice the symptoms if the child is older for the grade and thus able to compensate somewhat, since older kids may have a longer attention span, fewer wiggles, etc.--a kid struggling with these symptoms may still look comparatively normal if compared to younger kids in the same grade, if that makes sense. One of the diagnostic requirements for ADHD is that it be present in two or more settings--often one of them is school for school-aged kids, hence my mention of teachers.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics