Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "My 4 Yr Old Son's FSIQ is 131, Now What?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm not 9:51 and she devoted way more effort than I would have to explaining the meta-conversational issues. That said, I appreciate her efforts and understand why she bothered. [u]Basically, every discussion involving gifted issues gets derailed by what appears to be the same (or same couple) of posters.[/u] For awhile, it looked like this one might be different. But no. [u]So I read 9:51's approach as an attempt to explain to this poster/these posters what's producing the dysfunctional dynamic in the hope that future discussions on these issues could be more productive. [/u] I can see why, if you haven't seen this pattern repeated a number of times, the responses might seem crazily disproportionate to the provocations. So, FWIW, there's a broader context.[/quote] I am 9:51. This PP perfectly describes my reasons for posting the list. I think those 1-2 posters can contribute good value to discussions about giftedness. They clearly have studied the issue, and like I said, I might even agree with them on some points. But I've seen on this thread and a couple others that they sometimes inadvertently undermine their own advocacy with a style that comes across as dogmatic and off-putting. I'm sure that's not what they intend, but it nevertheless seems to happen repeatedly. I do hope there is a way to improve the dialogue.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics