Reply to Did the Takoma MS magnet got MORE white this year?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Did the Takoma MS magnet got MORE white this year?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

MCPS's own statistics shows which group has high test scores and which don't.  Apply probability and statistics to the numbers.  If the admittance breakdown to magnets is out of whack with MCPS's own statistics, then that means they are not accepting top performers, and indeed, MCPS has admitted that they look at peer cohort. There is no question about this fact.[/quote]

But that's not true if there truly is a deficit of seats compared to highly qualified students.  If, for example, you have 100 Asian students evaluated and 20 score at whatever your target threshold is (99% or whatever raw score) and you have 100 of some other race evaluated and only 5 score at your SAME target threshold, but you have 10 seats in the program, you can offer those seats to the 5 students of some other race and to 5 of the Asian students and everyone admitted will have met the same threshold for high performance.  There will just be 15 Asian kids who also met the same threshold but didn't get admitted.  And if those 15 all go to the same school, they will hopefully be a peer cohort in class with each other encouraging each other to excel.  Obviously no real life situation is as simple as a stripped-down example, but if there are not enough seats for all of the highly able students (which everyone seems to agree is the case) then it is entirely possible for the student body selected not to mirror the racial percentages of the entire pool (either of MCPS students or of MCPS students who score X on any particular metric) and for each admitted student to still be eminently qualified and not erode the quality of the program at all.  [/quote]
? you just made the argument for me regarding "peer cohort" vs individual performance, and that [b]they are using location as a proxy[/b] for race.[/quote]

Where did you get your information? Do you have a credible source inside the Central Office?[/quote]
The MS that were most affected by the "peer cohort" nonsense are the ones with low URM and FARMs. It's not really that hard to connect those dots.

It's kind of like how the Rs removed the SALT Deductions.  It's not hard to connect the dots that they took away this deduction to hurt the coastal blue states, , which disproportionately has high state income and property tax.

I don't think MCPS did this deliberately to go after wealthy  Asian/white students.  However,  it just so happens that many of these students are wealthy white/asian.  In this case, race and location are closely linked together, like how high state and property tax are closely linked with liberal coastal elites.[/quote]

Yep, MCPS took a page from the Blue State Screw Job and did one over on the W Pyramid Screw Job. Pay more taxes, get less services. Gracias![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics