Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She literally said ‘I am not mad at you’ seconds before he blew her head off. How does that show she is ‘unhinged’[/quote] She said it in a very snide tone. But honestly, I think her wife is the once who escalated it and holds most of the responsibility. How stupid can you be to block in law enforcement and then belittle and insult them?[/quote] Hey, I'm a doctor, and I get a lot more than that in the ER many days. If someone spits in my face AND belittles and insults me, is it still professional for me to choke them out? [/quote] DP. Nope, but if they do something that you reasonably believe imminently endangers your life, and you have no other option, you’re entitled to defend yourself. Moreover, if a patient has previously been abusive towards you, that obviously impacts a reasonable person’s assessment of what constitutes threatening behavior. So while her actions prior to moving the car obviously do not independently justify the shooting, they actually are relevant to whether the shooting was justified.[/quote] Well, you just made him look really bad since she smiled and said that she wasn't angry at them.[/quote] That’s certainly another relevant piece of the analysis. I don’t have a dog in this fight. I may be the only person on the entire internet who hasn’t made up their mind about this. IMO, based on what we know so far, both parties made mistakes. Based on this limited info, I think criminal liability will be a close call.[/quote] Which is why it should go to jury. It's extremely dangerous to allow the federal government to simply wave this away.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics