Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sangster should stop fighting rezoning and just focus on guaranteeing garndfathering for current Irving enrolled students to continue to WSHS.

6th and younger from that neighborhood should just attend LB with all of their friends and classmates from Sangster.[/quote]

Agreed. Other WSHS neighborhoods are looking at moving to lower performing schools. These are champagne problems for Sangster neighborhoods who could move from one great HS to another great HS. They’d be wise to focus on grandfathering. [/quote]

Moving this pocket causes Lake Braddock to be overcapacity 102-103%, and does nothing to help Lewis.  It also won't do anything to help WS overcrowding in the long run if you move them out and Rolling Valley kids in.  Region 4 Scenerio 4 does little to solve any long term problems, and ticks off a neighborhood who doesn't believe the split is an issue for their families and feels very connected to the WS community (because they are).  BRAC and Thru let region 4 down. [/quote]

I disagree.

The Springfield BRAC members did a great job following the BRAC instructions on focusing eliminating split feeders.

The Sangster neighborhood is getting moved to an equal or better school if you look at SAT scores, within their community and which they have equal or closer ties to than WSHS.

Of all the possible rezoning scenarios, the Springfield BRAC did the best possible outcome for WSHS and the Sangster neighborhood.

The Rolling Valley rezoning is Sandy Anderson's pet project, so you cannot blame the BRAC committee members for that one.

Even so, it did eliminate a split feeder.   Every change in map 4 for WSHS eliminated the WSHS split feeders.

You can't get mad at the BRAC committee members for following their instructions to a T.  You can't get mad at them for following instructions, just because other pyramid BRAC reps ignored the instructions.  You can't get mad at them for Rolling Valley, that is Sandy Anderson's thing and one of the main reasons why this rezoning process started.

Be mad at the process and the school board.  Don't be mad at the volunteer BRAC reps for following the process they were told to follow using the criteria they were given.[/quote]

Uggg...there's that faulty split feeder argument again.  The majority of split feeders in every other pyramid were not closed and parents across the county overwhelming did not see split feeders as an issue (including the families at Sangster). 'Fixing' Split feeders was ranked towards the bottom of the boundary survey and other region representatives actually represented their communities.  Both the West Springfield reps were Hunter Valley parents and kept Hunt Valley at WS instead of moving it to an unpopulated school.  This is less about Sangster and more about how mismanaged this whole process has been.  I actual appreciate all the work the BRAC put into this, but they were always set up to fail.  Region 4 Scenerio 4 is not the right one for WS or for the greater FCPS community. [/quote]

The process has been mismanaged but eliminating split feeders has always been a goal. That is a fact. Just because it wasn’t done at all schools across the county, and where it ranked on whatever priority list you point to doesn’t invalidate that. [/quote]

Uggg ..again.  Who said split feeders were an issue in the first place?  An outside consultant who didn't know the region?  A country wide survey of parents and teachers?  Or was this just an 'idea' from one main board member who is running the process.  [/quote]

The school board put eliminaring split feeders into Policy 8130, not the Thru condultant and not BRAC committee members.

Eliminating the Sangster split feeder is not something new from Map 4.

It was part of the early maps too, Maps 1-3.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics