Reply to Hearst Playground story in Current

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Would the soccer crowd be in favor of lighted fields?  That could allow an even greater number of users AND accommodate a pool.  Pool opponents better stop overplaying their hand or else additional solutions can easily be explored.  [/quote]

As in, we can fu@# Hearst Park up, or we can fu@ Hearst Park up the a$* if you keep opposing us.  Nice.[/quote]

No.  More as in we are calling your bluff to expose your true agenda.  [/quote]

To keep Hearst as a valuable green park which serves a lot of users, including Stoddert soccer.  Preserving the tree canopy in DC-managed parks is one of Casey Trees’ top strategic priorities.  Or we could slice and dice the park up, pave it with a lot more concrete and rename it a “DPR recreation facility center.”[/quote]

As has been cited at least 200 times in this thread, there isn't one proposal that includes the removal of any of the lined trees in the park. Not one.[/quote]

There has also not been one proposal that includes real dimensions.  Oh, and DGS says that while there is no intention to remove any of the large trees, they allow that treees may have to come down for “safety reasons.”  Like when construction impacts the root ball perhaps.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics