Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Confirming Fanni pays in cash. https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/politics/willis-wade-cash-payment-napa-valley-winery/index.html[/quote] This hardly proves that she repaid Wade in cash. [/quote] [b]Do you see any receipts that he was paid back via check or app? [/b]Her testimony, and his, was that she paid her way in cash. Unless you have proof that disproves that, then you have nothing. IOW, the defendants who caused this side-show, have nothing. Let's move on to the actual case, please.[/quote] That's the thing. There are no receipts. Do her bank statements show withdrawals that would show she is stashing cash? Probably not. Because, her story is BS. His bank statements don't show that cash was deposited. Curious, huh?[/quote] It’s not her job to provide proof. It’s on the defense to prove she didn’t pay him back. [/quote] And, it's up to the judge to determine whether he believes she is telling the truth since she has zero evidence to back up her claims. [/quote] She doesn’t need to provide any evidence to back up her claims. The burden to provide evidence lies with the accuser. [/quote] Her credibility is in question. As is Wade's. The judge will take that into consideration. And, because she has no evidence to prove she paid cash, he will take that into consideration as well. What the judge DOES have is receipts showing Wade paid for several trips for the two of them. [/quote] Lack of evidence is not evidence. The judge understands evidentiary rules, even though you do not. It is the job of the defense to back up their claims with evidence. I haven’t seen any evidence that she didn’t pay him with cash. The defense failed at proving this. All of those testifying about when the relationship started have credibility issues. I blame Tucker for convincing stupid people that questions are evidence of anything. They’re just questions. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics