Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Swift is a brand. And the brand needed to separate itself and create distance from the whole lawsuit. I don't think the brand will be impacted by this at all.

Taylor as a person has made lots of questionable decisions in her life but most aren't invested in her as a person, they are invested in the brand. What she does in her private life is pretty disconnected from the brand and the public life. [/quote]

This is out of touch. Swift is getting dragged for this like nothing I’ve ever seen. Millions of women are not just [b]re-visiting the Scooter, masters, and “Taylor’s version” narrative,[/b] they now believe all of it was a con. Not to mention it dovetails on the worst album of her career. Can’t take dings like this at her age. Middle aged female pop stars don’t have come backs.[/quote]

I'm familiar with that history but can you explain why it's implicated here?[/quote]

Scooter is not a good guy either but legally he owned Taylor's songs. Her team had signed the contracts and they were legally his. When she wanted them back and he wouldn't sell them to her, she made him out to be evil and herself a victim - a horrible man not giving a woman what was rightfully her own creative work - and her fan base turned on him. He stood firm and she eventually re-recorded those songs but she definitely tried to manipulate her fan base to see her as a victim in a situation where she was just in a contract she didn't want to be in.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics