Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was wondering why the Judge was so subservient to Fani in his own courtroom.

Now it makes sense.[/quote]

Are you serious?  [/quote]

"McAfee was an assistant district attorney in the Barrow County, Georgia, Piedmont Judicial Circuit.[8] He joined the office of the district attorney in Fulton County, Georgia, in April 2015, initially working on the early stages of criminal cases.[9] He later was promoted to working as a prosecutor in the complex trial division, which was then headed by prosecutor Fani Willis, who was later elected as Fulton County district attorney.[i][u][1][10] McAfee was eventually promoted to senior assistant district attorney in the major case division, where he prosecuted felony cases including armed robbery and murder.[5][1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_F._McAfee...%20of%20Georgia%20v.[/quote]

So somehow your wiki quote makes him "subservient" to her?  Have you ever met a lawyer?  A prosecutor? Or a judge?

Or anyone?[/quote]

Yes. I have practiced civil litigation for 19 years.[/quote]

Then you know that judges are not subservient.

Knock it off.[/quote]

I will not.

My postings are not only based on 19 years of legal experience but I I also watched every second of ALL the arguments and ALL the testimony including any comments by the judge over 2 days.

My point is precise that judges do not tolerate the behavior/conduct Fani displayed period. In any other courtroom such a behavior will 100% result in contempt of court based on my 19 years of legal experience.

Thereby, only plausible explanation is that he directly received 2 promotions and directly worked under Fani for 4/6 years he had been a lawyer before becoming a judge.[/quote]

Ah so now the theory is that Fani has a magic crystal ball and years ago predicted her big chance to destroy your beloved innocent Donald Trump and hatched a secret scheme to manipulate the whole system to put her lackeys and minions on the bench as judges.  Yep, suuuure...  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: [/quote]

No, Fani just got lucky (or arranged perhaps?) that she drew the ONE judge who happened to work directly under her for 4 years (out of 6 total legal experience) and Fani was the one who promoted McAfee TWICE at the DA's office.

What a coincidence. Lot of coincidences going on at that DA's office.[/quote]

Have you heard of Judge Cannon?

I mean, these things happen. It is pure lottery.[/quote]

:roll: Yeah, right. The Atlanta Political Machine lottery.[/quote]

You have zero evidence of "The Atlanta Political Machine" being behind this.  You're just failing wildly.[/quote]

But when it’s a red county you’re the first one to call them racist hillbilly crooks, aren’t you? Urban machines are corrupt as hell because there’s so much money sloshing around. The average hillbilly county might want to be corrupt but there’s not enough people and money sloshing around. Go to a Southern county meeting and you’ll see gadflies who examine every little  line item like a hawk. While this $800K or whatever it was legal fee to her married boyfriend isn’t even a blip on the radar around Atlanta. You think there are public servant hillbillies in the South taking first class trips to fake conferences and living it up in 5 star hotels? Hell no.[/quote]

800k? Really, where is that dollar figure from?[/quote]

[b]“County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.”[/quote][/b]

Maybe you should has listened to the testimony instead of quoting an article. That allegation was sufficiently answered.  You don't seem to understand the wild cost of litigation.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics