Reply to Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well this is embarrassing:

PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court is in receipt of 1 Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief. To facilitate appropriate resolution, on or before August 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the Motion further elaborating on the following: (1) the asserted basis for the exercise of this Court's jurisdiction, whether legal, equitable/anomalous, or both; (2) the framework applicable to the exercise of such jurisdiction; (3) the precise relief sought, including any request for injunctive relief pending resolution of the Motion; (4) the effect, if any, of the proceeding before Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart; and (5) the status of Plaintiff's efforts to perfect service on Defendant. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 8/23/2022. (AMC) (Entered: 08/23/2022)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64911367/trump-v-united-states/

Seems like some of these issues would have been addressed if they had filed a complaint.  Judge is going soft on them.  [/quote]

This is the judge giving Trump's lawyers hints on how to pursue the case.  Notice she mentions "injunctive relief pending resolution," which Trump's brief very notably did not ask for.  And she raises anomalous jurisdiction.  Bad sign that this judge is not on the up and up.[/quote]

Injunctive relief is kind of implied, to halt the FBI’s review of materials seized pending appointment of a special master.  I think this whole thing is garbage too, but it’s not helpful for people to spin out nonsense on the other side too. [/quote]

1. A litigant needs to request injunctive or other extraordinary relief.

2. A litigant needs to demonstrate a legal and factual predicate for injunctive or other extraordinary relief. This generally means citations to case law and affidavits.

3. It appears there was not even a passing effort to seek a TRO. TFG waited two weeks to file his “motion” and a response to a properly filed motion would not otherwise be due until 14 days after service, unless otherwise ordered.

4. Had TFG properly sued DOJ, the US would have been afforded 60 days to file a responsive pleading or move to dismiss, subject to the filing of a motion for injunctive relief.

This is bizarro gamesmanship in an effort to get away from Reinhart.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics