Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If they were going to redo boundaries, they should have started from scratch.  Example - given travel distance, ALL of Sangster should go to WSHS, instead of the small attendance island being shifted to Braddock.  
Sangster kids are traveling up to half hour to get to Braddock, whereas WSHS is much closer.[/quote]

Blah, blah, blah.  The start from scratch idea is such a non starter on so many levels, no where close to a serious comment.[/quote]

It’s what FCPS originally said it planned to do.  Then they got cold feet and we ended up with this largely pointless reshuffling.  [/quote]
When did they say they were going to start from scratch? I’m calling BS.[/quote]
Some board members said a lot of grandiose things at the start of this process. However, enough board members pushed back about grandfathering that the scope quickly shrank. [/quote]
Nice try. I’ll ask again, when did they say they were starting from scratch?  I’m pretty certain you are straight up sour grape lying.[/quote]

I've started following this chain...but I've noticed that you in particular are the person who likes to post the phrase 'sour grapes'...it's an oddly specific phrase and helps identify you as one person playing multiple people for the sake of just stirring the pot.  I just wanted you to know I'm praying for you. [/quote]

Multiple people? 🤣 When have I claimed to be “multiple people?

You false statement matches your false claim that they said they were starting from scratch. Again, just calling BS on your lie.

I’ll ask you again, since you are clearing dodging, when did anyone at FCPS or on the SB, ever at any point in process, say they were starting from scratch?[/quote]

DP.  It sounds like you ascribe a ton of significance to the use or non-use of the phrase "start from scratch."

As a PP said, that phrase may not have been used.  The phrase "comprehensive" is used, and you might want to look at the definition of that term.

I personally heard first-hand that Reid told people in early community meetings the boundary review could be "transformational."

So you'd have to be deliberately obtuse not to know that the School Board started out with grand ambitions and beat a hasty retreat over time.  Indeed, it was the fear of these larger ambitions that led your Langley friends to demand multiple meetings with Robyn Lady and set up FairFACTS Matters in the summer of 2024.

Feel free to alternate "sour grapes" with "go touch grass," but your rhetoric betrays the constant fights you try to pick here.  [/quote]

I suspect this poster is also the one who says “boundary changes for thee but not for me.” She really need a hobby and a life.[/quote]

I think there are at least two of them and they are batshit crazy 🤪. They always post right after each other and will comment on everything related to wshs/lewis, no matter the day or night.  I suspect they are Daventry homeowners who are worried about their property values (even though they claim to be well off).  I gave up fighting with them in the original boundary thread. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics