Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump found Guilty on all charges! "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pg 150. Has anyone named the "federal crime" that was broken? [/quote] You will get responses like "read the verdict" or "we have told you but you didn't want to hear it" but the truth is....... Nobody knows the "underlying crime" because it was not indicated in the verdict and the jury didn't have to specify on the jury sheet. So, no, we don't know. Blatantly unConstitutional. [/quote] Actually if you read the case which you have not it was spelled out 1000% documented he broke NY criminal code 34 times felonies. This is not hard for a reader above 2nd grade. Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. And yes it was spelled out. Yes it was communicated to a jury. Yes he is a citizen of the US just like you subject to criminal codes in the states he breaks them which in this case was NY. You are a moron. [/quote] Have you even followed the case for 5 minutes? The business records charge isn't a felony unless it was in furtherance of another crime, which has never been specified. [/quote] The other crimes were specified in the jury instructions.[/quote] That's right! Describing the crime during the trial is a waste of time because we'd have to present evidence and witnesses that can be cross examined. Orange man doesn't deserve that! It's best to simply provide some ideas to the 100% democrat jury during instructions and let them pick what sounds appropriate. The appeals courts are packed with judges who hate his guts. Good luck, Orange man! [/quote] They were also specified in the bill of particulars a year ago. And there was plenty of testimony and evidence in regards to them. All the testimony about whether she was hushed up because of the campaign instead of because of Melania, for instance.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics