Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump found Guilty on all charges! "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pg 150. Has anyone named the "federal crime" that was broken? [/quote] You will get responses like "read the verdict" or "we have told you but you didn't want to hear it" but the truth is....... Nobody knows the "underlying crime" because it was not indicated in the verdict and the jury didn't have to specify on the jury sheet. So, no, we don't know. Blatantly unConstitutional. [/quote] Actually if you read the case which you have not it was spelled out 1000% documented he broke NY criminal code 34 times felonies. This is not hard for a reader above 2nd grade. Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. And yes it was spelled out. Yes it was communicated to a jury. Yes he is a citizen of the US just like you subject to criminal codes in the states he breaks them which in this case was NY. You are a moron. [/quote] Have you even followed the case for 5 minutes? The business records charge isn't a felony unless it was in furtherance of another crime, which has never been specified. [/quote] The other crimes were specified in the jury instructions.[/quote] Yes. 3 possibilities were provided to the jury. The problem is that Merchan did not instruct the jury that it must find unanimously which of those crimes (the predicate act) had been committed. Under similar statutes (RICO for example) the jury must agree unanimously on the predicate offense) or the case will be overturned. This has been determined by countless courts at both the state and federal level. The problem here is that no court in NY has ruled on this specific statute. But no matter how you view this it was terribly sloppy of the court and the prosecution to let this waive in the wind.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics