Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Merrick Garland - O's pick for scotus"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What is wrong with just following the Biden rule? He was chairman of the Judiciary committee and is now the VP........ he has credibility and strives for bipartisanship.[/quote] Because it's a dumb rule.[/quote] I get it that it is a "dumb rule" because when Biden proposed it we had a Republican president in office. How about the "Schumer rule" which he offered almost 18 months before GWB's term ended? Of course, it is politics and in an ideal world politics should not enter into Supreme Court nominations and confirmations. It really is quite simple: if what the Republicans are doing is so wrong, argue the case before the American people and try and get the Republican senators who are running for reelection defeated because they will not hold a hearing. If the American people agree with you then some or all of these senators will be defeated and the people will have affirmed that Garland should have been given a hearing. In the meantime, the Supreme Court will continue to function and the country will survive a vacancy on the court. BTW, I support giving Garland a hearing ....... but I know the Democrats as evidenced by Biden and Schumer's comments would do the very same thing if roles had been reversed because both parties indulge in political opportunism and nonsense.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics