Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Murch moving to lafayette "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I love the way all the Lafayette people come here with doom and gloom scenarios. Yes, there needs to be proper planning, but there is simply no reason to build another demountable farm further away when a perfectly good one exists. When was the last time Lafayette students needed to be evacuated to Blessed Sacrament? [/quote] I'm a Murch person, I think swinging at Lafayette is a terrible idea. Why is having 1400 kids on site at Lafayette better than staying on site at Murch? The arguments I've seen against swinging on site amount to two things: that it's dangerous to be on a live construction site (which Lafayette kids have been doing this year, without any problems) and that there won't be enough play space (which doubling the number of kids on Lafayette's site while leaving trailers on the fields doesn't really address). I can't understand the loud aversion to swinging on site, but it's a real thing among a certain subset of Murch families. Most of the kids would stay in the building during the renovation. Why is that not preferable to schlepping up to a bunch of trailers on a field for two years? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics