Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Feminism, femininity, and marriage"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"Men are by and large the violent ones. Men are the problem. And they know it." [b]Correct - if "the problem" means violence. [/b] "Men know women are just as capable and smart, perhaps more so." [b]Just as capable and smart, yes. "More so" - I don't see any evidence of that. If I had to guess, I'd say the bulk is pretty much even with the outliers -- both the dumbest and the smartest being men. I think, biologically, men are expendable (sperm is plentiful, eggs and incubation more resource-intensive), so nature gambles with men, hitting the jackpot some and going bust some. [/b] "We are less prone to be destructive and anti-social." [b]Less destructive - yes. Less anti-social - doubtful. I see more toxic relationships between women than between men. Basically, women tend to be more indirect with their aggression. [/b] "We can make more humans if we want with very little contribution from men. We don't need you. Oh the irony that for centuries religion insisted that women needed religion to resist their baser natures. When we have proof every day that it is men who are unable to govern themselves, and women can do just fine without them." [b]You just went off the rails. Yes, you can make more humans. But supporting them and protecting them requires a little more support. I think the religious oppression of women has more to do with the association of religion with the state, and the state's mission to protect the property interests of the elite. In particular, control of female reproduction has been a means of attempting to assure that a man's resources pass to his biological children and not to the biological children of the man who cuckolded him. [/b] "This is why you are seeing angry tirades and backlash. This is why everyone talks about Obama "coming for my guns!" when in reality, no one has touched your guns. They are actually coming for our birth control. Everyone knows a woman who is unable to control when and how she becomes pregnant/a mother is at a serious disadvantage. And many men instinctively want women at a disadvantage. Just like the good old days." [b]Agree with most of that, though the Obama/guns thing seems like a bit of a tangent. I don't see most men regarding themselves as particularly advantaged. Instead, there is a smallish segment of (mostly white) men who hold most of the advantages. Sure, you can't get into that club without being a man. But most men won't ever be part of that club. [/b][/quote] With "antisocial" being sociopathy, males are 3X more likely to be sociopaths than women: http://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-people-are-psychopaths-sociopaths[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics