Reply to Lottery results are up

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Lottery results are up"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Also has anyone been deemed ineligible for Walls yet? Odd for that designation to be appearing for one school but not the other. McKinley's waitlist is likely small enough that they didn't have to do a cutoff, but I would presume that Walls and Banneker would have similar applicant numbers and similar cut offs for the lottery pool.[/quote]

The difference is that Walls puts every kid they interview but who doesn't match on a waitlist. And then that waitlist moves some amount over the summer/fall.

Banneker (and McKinley) have historically not maintained a waitlist - so they match the kids they match and no one else gets in.

More transparency in all of the selective high school application review processes would be very valuable, but DCPS doesn't want it so it won't happen.[/quote]

One has to wonder why DCPS doesn’t want transparency.[/quote]

Isn’t it obvious?  Equity people.  [/quote]

I’m actually not sure if that’s it. But there is something super shady about the process.[/quote]

Well the city actually said they wanted more kids from wards that were under-represented at Walls when they dropped the test.  They actually sent people out to schools in ward 7 and 8 to tell the kids to apply.[/quote]

But Walls didn’t actually wind up enrolling more kids from Wards 7 and 8. The Post did a story on it. What they have is a system that enrolls a wildly disproportionate number of kids from Deal, Hardy, and the Hill, but is unpredictable about which of those kids it takes. [/quote]

I would suggest relooking at recent data because a lot less kids are getting in from ward 3.  [/quote]

The Hill is not Ward 3.  And lots of kids at Deal and Hardy don’t live in Ward 3.  Where are the stats on students enrolled in the school by Ward over the past several years?[/quote]

Students IB for each HS as a percent of total SWW student body SY19-20 to SY24-25 
J-R 37% to 33%
MacArthur NA to 7%
Eastern 22% to 16%
Dunbar 9% to 10%
Cardozo 8% to 7%
Coolidge 6% to 7%
Roosevelt 5% to 8%
Anacostia 4% to 4%
Ballou 4% to 4%
Woodson 3% to 4%

So minimal/no change for Wards 1, 2, 5, 7 and 8, more students from Wards 3 and 4, fewer students from Ward 6.

You can also look at SWW students as a percent of total students living in each boundary*. From SY19-20 to SY24-25 
Anacostia 1% to 1%
Ballou 1% to 1%
Cardozo 4% to 2%
Coolidge 3% to 2%
Dunbar 3% to 2%
Eastern 9% to 5%
Woodson 1% to 1%
JR 13% to 11%
MacArthur NA to 11%
Roosevelt 2% to 2%

*It's hard to make too many conclusions from this because these numbers only draw from the population that actually ended up at a DC public or charter school for HS.[/quote]

Hmmmm at least directionally this shows the same pattern you see from other selective schools dropping entrance exams. You don’t get more representation from underrepresented neighborhoods, basically, and sometimes less.[/quote]

Look, I doubt it’s what was intended and it’s not necessarily good for Walls, but I think the unpredictable admissions at Walls have been good for the DC school landscape more broadly, and are also mostly good for individual students.

The fundamental policy problem with Walls is one that no admissions procedure can solve: there are more qualified students seeking a free college prep high school education in DC than there is room, physically, in the Walls facility.

The lack of predictability at Walls has forced families who previously assumed Walls was their future to think seriously about J-R, Latin, Basis, DCI, Banneker, Duke, MacArthur, and McKinley Tech as college-prep options. Eastern seems to be next in line. Some families have gone private or moved to the suburbs, but others attend these high schools, reinforcing their status as college prep pathways.

This constellation of smaller college-prep programs is good for the kids, too. Back in the 80s and 90s the prevailing idea was that all smart kids needed to be gathered together. But right now elite colleges limit the number of kids they take from each high school, so collecting all the high performers into one high school works against them for college admissions. (There is actually a thread going on the college board right now about this problem at TJ!) Gathering all the highest-testing kids together at Walls would make the 8th grade application/lottery season less stressful, but the present quasi-random approach gives us a better overall school system and better overall college outcomes.[/quote]

Probably the best thing in terms of college admissions for DCPS parents was student for fair admissions v. Harvard. It gives you a HUGE incentive to stay in DCPS as schools are using ZIP and historical data as a proxy. [/quote]

The TAG increase is good too, for people interested in state schools. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics