Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Taylor Meeting at Wootton"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]"The argument is that a vote taken while active complaints are pending at both the IG and the state board of education creates a legitimacy problem that doesn't go away just because the vote passed. If the IG subsequently finds process violations or data irregularities, you've already implemented a permanent boundary change built on a flawed foundation. Unwinding that is exponentially harder and more expensive than pausing 30-60 days to get it right the first time." If all it takes to delay a boundary study is the mere filing of an IG complaint, there would never be any boundary changes implemented. Boundary changes by definition will cause intense backlash against those affected by the boundary changes. MCPS can't be held hostage by frivolous complaints. Let's be honest - the 30-60 days is not how long an IG process takes from complaint to determination. Crown has to be filled by August 2027, and we can't have that hanging until every frivolous complaint is decided. Also, an IG wouldn't review the Taylor rec on the merits for "data irregularities." You're thinking you can get from the IG what you can't get from a court. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics