Reply to Meghan King Edmonds loses custody of kids to Jim Edmonds

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Meghan King Edmonds loses custody of kids to Jim Edmonds"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hard to believe, but in the 2000s, Jim Edmonds was actually quite the eligible bachelor in St. Louis due to being part of a really great Cardinals team.  I could see how Meghan ignored the red flags when they met.

I lived in STL and followed Meghan early on social media.  Looking back, I can see now that some of her posts - even going back 15 years - were really manic.  It wouldn't surprise me if she had mental illness.  Add in 3 kids in 2 years, a cheating spouse and other stressors... and I imagine she just broke.  To me, her oversharing on social media seems like a cry for help.

I don't know that Edmonds is the monster people are making him out to be.  I guess it's good he and his wife are stepping up with the kids.  But to move his kids to TN at a time when they probably really need their mother and some assurance she's going to be okay... I dunno.  Seems like it would've been better for them to relocate back to STL and help Meghan get the help she needs.

Her family was a nice, normal St. Louis family back in the day.  I wonder if they are trying to stay involved in the kids' lives.  I imagine it's really tough when your daughter's ex has unlimited funds and is revered in STL.

Poor kids.  [b]I hope Jim is being a good father[/b] and that their mom gets well.[/quote]

Please explain to me how he's being a "good father" by suddenly removing the children from their entire world in STL. He has unlimited funds, he can afford to set up a home in STL quickly.
[/quote]

Given he has custody now, being a good father is giving them a safe and stable home to live in. Many people move with their kids when they have primary or sole custody to be in the best environment for the family. [/quote]

He can set up a "safe and stable" home in STL, so the kids can continue to live where they have been growing up. In fact, he has the ability to quickly rent a fully furnished mansion in STL, so as to provide the kids which as much normalcy as possible in this horrendous situation. He did not do that.

As to your second statement, that's simply over-generalized and wrong. "Many people...", just, no. I have primary custody and I cannot just up and move with my kids. Primary custody and sole custody are two very different things.

As to Jim's newly acquired sole custody, he has very obvious longtime roots in STL as do his kids AND the kids' mother. He just moved to TN this year, a place to which he has zero significant connection. Literally only months. What an absolute joke.

If you cannot see through this, I can't help you.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics