Reply to Jesus' Historicity

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Jesus' Historicity"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am now wondering which community is the more intolerant, believers or atheists, lol. [/quote]

I’m personally intolerant of lies and bullsht.

[/quote]

Contempt is a bad look. I am new to these goings on. Do believers dump on atheists the way atheists refer to believers' beliefs as nonsense, lies, myths etc.?[/quote]

Yes - Believers tend to think that non-believers are evil.  Meanwhile, belief in the supernatural actually is "nonsense, lies, myths".  You don't believe in fairies or Santa anymore, do you?  But you still believe in God and angels.[/quote]

Equating belief in the Christian God (or any God) with belief in fairies or Santa Claus, implying it’s equally childish or irrational?

Fairies and Santa are ad-hoc explanations for specific phenomena (where do missing cookies go? who brings presents?). When better explanations appear (parents, tooth fairy money under the pillow), they’re discarded without the worldview collapsing.

The idea of God isn’t an explanation for one narrow thing. It’s the attempt to answer the deepest ‘why is there something rather than nothing?’ questions: why the universe exists at all, why it’s finely tuned for life, why there’s objective morality, why consciousness exists. Billions of people (including many brilliant scientists and philosophers) find theism the most coherent answer to those big questions.

I don’t believe in God because I’m afraid of the dark or because I never grew out of fairy tales. I believe because, after looking at the arguments (cosmological, teleological, moral, the historical case for the resurrection, personal experience, etc.), theism makes more sense of reality than naturalism does to me.

You’re free to weigh the same evidence and come to the opposite conclusion — that’s fair. But dismissing it as ‘believing in fairies’ is a rhetorical jab, not an argument. It’s like me saying atheism is just ‘believing in magic exploding universes from nothing and that your thoughts are just meaningless brain fizz.’

That feels clever, but it doesn’t actually engage the real reasons people hold these views.[/quote]

You are correct. We can reasonably weigh the same evidence and come to different conclusions.

"Magic exploding universes" is a straw man fallacy. The Big Bang theory is a cosmological model supported by robust physical evidence (CMB radiation, red shift, etc.). It does not propose creation "from nothing" in a philosophical sense. It relies on the laws of physics operating under extreme conditions. You are also making the error of presupposing that our universe came from nothing. The "nothing" involved in quantum fluctuation theories is a very specific, technical form of physical reality, not an absolute void.

In my view, the most telling part of your statement is your concern of “worldview collapsing.” The profound difficulty involved in potentially dismantling an entire understanding of reality underscores that, for many, the belief structure is inextricably linked to an emotional need for order, meaning, and purpose. This attachment often manifests as a fear-based response. The fear of chaos, the fear of the unknown, and perhaps most centrally, the fear that life might be meaningless without a divine architect.

The universe is a physical phenomenon operating according to natural laws. [b]It has no inherent objective purpose or meaning built into it.[/b] This view does not claim life is meaningless. Rather, it posits that life has no pre-ordained or transcendent meaning. Purpose in life is the challenge that we human beings have to actively create and define for ourselves through connection, experience, passion, and contribution.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics