Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We know both Clinton and trump (and Melania) were involved, trump with the most involvement, so it makes sense in trumps head to deflect and deny, and blame. Don't try to make sense of a fools mind. I doubt Biden would protect Clinton, so I’m not sure what the motivator would be there. [/quote] Probably only in a certain person's head. Melania? There's an interview with Trump from 2015 before he ran the first time when he said HRC's biggest liability was Bill and his connections to Epstein. Trump has talked about Epstein on off, he's never clammed up the way you would expect of someone guilty. It's pretty clear Trump and Epstein did have social friendship and like plenty of men do when women aren't around, would be lewd and vulgar and joking with each other. Most men indulge in this behavior when with their good buddies, although I'm sure the degrees vary. But it doesn't mean there was anything more to it. Given that multiple administrations from both parties have sat on the files I do agree with the PP who suggested it's to protect someone or something. Look at Trump, his administration was all for it till they actually got the files, and the behavior of everyone from Trump down is one of "oh sh...t" But who would be protected by both Trump and Biden? I used to scoff at the notion of a certain country in the ME using Epstein to entrap people and blackmailing them to benefit that country's policies. It was ridiculous and antisemitic. Or so I thought. But I actually can see that happening, and process of elimination tells me there cannot be anyone in US politics who needs to be protected by both parties. Not even Bill Clinton. So are they protecting someone outside the US? I hate going down this path because of what the public reaction would mean. But it does seem a bit more plausible than it was when I first heard the rumor. And you can see both Biden and Trump realizing they need to stop this from being publicly acknowledged. Especially in the last two years. Or maybe it really is just a bunch of rich donors to both parties. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics