Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Which among WASP would you choose to ED and why?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Thanks for presenting your empty credentials but go on the Princeton grad student page and see how difficult it is to find a person with a BA from WASP[/quote] You really have no idea what you are talking about. Here are outcomes of recent Swarthmore Alumni. You'll find them at graduate school at MIT, Stanford, Yale, Princeton amongst others. https://digital.swarthmore.edu/outcomes/ [/quote][/quote] not a single grad at Princeton for a PhD in math, just an operations research PhD at MIT. Lord you people don’t even read your own sources.[/quote] Ph.D feeders for math, per capita: 1)CIT 2) Harvey Mudd 3) MIT 4) Pomona 5) Swarthmore 6) Princeton 7) Reed 8) Chicago 9) Carleton 10) St. Olaf https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-phd-programs#math Majority are SLACs. Now go away.[/quote] The type of grad schools Harvey Mudd and Caltech students are getting into is not the same as Pomona or Reed.[/quote] Do you have something to back that up except your poorly thought out little stew of bias and ignorance?[/quote] Omg stop being any and look at their major outcome reports if you’re so worried[/quote] Please enlighten us. Otherwise you are just spouting unsupported nonsense.[/quote] You can find institutional research reports. You’re not a child and know how to find sources.[/quote] Please do, it's your assertion that requires detail. The govt data which you choose to interpret in a manner not consistent with reality indicates that your assertion is without merit. So it's time to put up or shut up.[/quote] So you have no intention at looking at any source but shouting? Great.[/quote] Actually you were the one who started with the assertion that SLAC Math majors don't place as well as students from Berkeley, Princeton, and MIT without anything at all to back that up.....and still crickets from your sorry little ass. But, let's use Berkeley since you asked.......Current Math Phd students with undergrad degrees from Amherst, Wellesley, and Williams. So why don't you just STFU and crawl back into your little hole.[/quote] I said Princeton. Once again, another person who is here with an agenda and can’t stay on topic. Show that at Princeton for a PhD in math a grad student is more likely to be from an LAC than a top research university. Seriously try making that stupid argument. Link the Berkeley grad students.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics