Reply to Changes in LACs

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Changes in LACs "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^disagree about Bates climbing.[/quote]
Disagree? Bates must’ve missed your memo, because their endowment has doubled in the last decade, and they’ve been aggressively expanding research facilities and faculty. They’re pulling in a stronger applicant pool, with [b]many students eyeing them as a top alternative to schools like Middlebury or Hamilton[/b]. Plus, with their major investments in faculty and national recruiting, they’re making noise in the liberal arts world. But hey, feel free to keep sleeping on them—Bates is already on the rise.[/quote]
By [b]statistical aspects[/b], the student body at Bates doesn't seem to compare with those of Middlebury or Hamilton. [/quote]
I'd love to hear the difference of means tests you did, since you mention [I]statistical[/I] analysis of the following: 
College | SAT(25th , 50th , 75th)
Bates | (1410, 1450, 1490)
Middlebury | (1450, 1500, 1530)
Hamilton | (1460, 1500, 1530)
A difference of about 4-5 questions between average Bates and average Middlebury/Hamilton scores. Must be some pretty low variation if a jump from 96 to 98th percentile is significant.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics