Reply to Lessons learned so far: 2024-2025

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Lessons learned so far: 2024-2025"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I think the key problem is that the admissions standards at any given school are a black box, where you don't know in great detail precisely how decisions are made. Colleges COULD release these data, but that would a) lead to applicants trying to game the system; and b) probably reduce the number of applicants, since it would be clearer what factors wouldn't lead to admission. Colleges obviously want more applicants.

With colleges receiving so many applications today, there HAS to be a score or algorithm-based method for sorting them. The idea that each of the 20,000 applicants has an AO looking into their soul just isn't practical. Knowing the true break points -- below this SAT/GPA you're not getting in, above so-and-so level and you're basically a lock, and in-between you're a maybe based on other factors -- would help a lot of kids.

The Harvard lawsuit didn't provide more detail on how the sausage is made. But there's still not a lot of really useful data out there. For instance, simply knowing the average test scores of BOTH admitted and denied applicants would be useful to know, and that's an easy stat for them to produce.

[/quote]
Feels like there is a market for algorithm-based consulting to provide more certainty in helping to make the list. However, my guess is that enrollment management consultants probably sign some sort of contract preventing them from using proprietary info, an anti-compete clause or similar. Sorry, too much coffee this morning.[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics