Reply to RTO EO is up

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "RTO EO is up "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What are we thinking at SEC?

My view is this EO is cover for the agency heads who want staff back full time - and want to please the WH - to do so. Some obviously really really want to please Trump - see Marco Rubio and make Maga happy. But what about outsiders like Atkins? I mean he's a Trump appointee so I can see wanting to play ball. But he's not looking to run for political office either and may not be interested in engaging in a ongoing fight with the union over every little thing. Are the financial regulators going to run with the "applicable law" part - i.e. we have a CBA in place?

I live close to the office so NBD for me but I def have colleagues who are worried who bought houses as far as Richmond.[/quote]

The SEC will promulgate a policy with as much wiggle room as the EO. Managerial discretion, exemptions, ad hoc, blah blah blah. I don’t envy managers who will be dealing with this as their full time job now. [/quote]

But will it try to apply it to bargaining unit employees and rescind the CBA [/quote]

They'll try but the CBA is a contract - it's not like you can rescind it without litigation which drags it out a number of years.[/quote]

And in the meantime employees are coming into the office five days per week![/quote]
You clearly don’t understand labor law, contracts or injunctions, so please step aside. [/quote]

You seem awfully confident a judge would issue an injunction.

[/quote]

Probably because PP understands the circumstances under which injunctions are issued. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics