Reply to How many men would stay w/o sex

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "How many men would stay w/o sex "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Np. Sex is a need. No its not as needed as food and water, but it is a need nonetheless. Just like companionship and social interaction. Nobody dies without companionship and social interaction, but its not feasible to live without SOME level of social interaction.

No woman dies if the husband is not doing his share of financial or at home responsibilities. Since she wont die if the husband is a couch potato, its a ‘want’ that husband should pull his weight? [/quote]

NP. No it's not. It's not a need, and lying to make it seem like one makes you seem crazy and out of control. [/quote]
There’s not a single lie in my statement. Debate me on what I said. According to your logic, it should not be a big deal to a woman if her husband is a loser and a couch potato since she is not going to die if he is. [/quote]
DP, but you are the only one conflating "not a need" with "not a big deal". The pps you are replying to even said they would take you (and others) more seriously if you used the correct language, ie "sex is a big deal or dealbreaker in my relationship". You are more than welcome to feel like it is a big deal. Just as those women don't feel that a man bringing home the bacon is a "need", but rather an important aspect of their relationship (to them). [/quote]

You are weirdly fixated on the nomenclature. I'm not the one above, but financial security is a need for everyone as well. Whether you expect your husband to fulfill that need for you or you do it yourself is a different conversation but it is a need.[/quote]
Financial security may be, sure. But as you say, how you fulfill that is a different conversation. While the security is the "need", who does what to get there certainly isn't. [/quote]

A sane person might venture to say that you fulfill your sexual [u]needs[/u] within your marriage. It's entirely reasonable to expect that in a marriage.[/quote]
Again, not a need. [/quote]

Again, yes it is. You can feel free to state that you don't THINK it is though. [/quote]

If it is then fulfill it all by yourself. It’s not a need to fulfill it with another human [/quote]
This post shows what a nutcase this individual is [/quote]
You do realize single, asexual, some disabled people, etc don't have sex and are totally fine? [/quote]
What does this have to do with people who are healthy, married, have normal libido and do not have any major disability?[/quote]
Huh? Are you on the wrong thread? This thread is not about those people. And someone calling pp a "nutcase" for pointing out that you can have sexual release w/o a partner shows your lack of education and how you are approaching this conversation in bad faith. [/quote]

THe conversation started that way with OP's post but there has been a different conversation going on for pages now. Please read the entire thread before posting nonsense.[/quote]
How is it nonsense? Pointing out that many people survive or even thrive w/o sex w/ another person is certainly relevant in a conversation about how it's a "need". [/quote]

And no one is talking about those people. We are talking about one spouse deciding arbitrarily to stop se while the other very much wants it and desires it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics