Reply to Why are youth and high school sports so competitive to get into now?

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "Why are youth and high school sports so competitive to get into now?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]XCountry and oboe are for losers.  Girls like guitar players and basketball/soccer players.  It good to have both.[/quote]

Cross country stars usually are tall with low body fat - hard to run blisteringly fast and not have a six pack for example.  I can attest there are women that prefer that physique to the outside linebacker type.  [/quote]

NO, NO, and NO.  Women prefer soccer players over XC stars.[/quote]

I can't believe a discussion can turn so stupid. It might be true that - statistically speaking - more women are attracted to soccer players. That doesn't mean that your XC star struggles to attract women because the XC star does not compete with the soccer players for the same pool of women. Simple minds, simple thoughts. [/quote]

Women will overwhelmingly choose soccer/baseball/tennis players over XC superstars.  Think of it like this:  XC is like a violinist, while soccer/baseball/tennis players are like lead singer/guitarist.  You can be the most famous violinist, Joshua Bell, play the most difficult piece at the metro station and 99% of the people would not know who you are.  On the other hand, if you are Shawn Mendes or Bruno Mars, play the guitar and sing at the metro station, the women will mob you, for good reasons.  FWIW, Joshua Bell played 45 minutes and got $32, LOL.... In summary, XC is for losers.[/quote]

Somebody’s hitting the boxed wine hard tonight.[/quote]

At least we know what sports her kids play.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics