Reply to Bye-bye Chevron

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bye-bye Chevron "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pretty much the bedrock of the federal government’s ability to implement laws into regulations.

Judges are new policymakers. Did you ever expect this when you studied Chevron in law school?

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/17/us/supreme-court-chevron-case.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Ok0.wcXh.XpnPeh6hJGP8&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare[/quote]

It is honestly outrageous this is even possible. 
This is a BEDROCK of federal law and stare decisis X 1000000.

And now JUDGES are going to set policy?  Everyone should be outraged by this, across the political spectrum. [/quote]

"BEDROCK" since 1984?

Somehow the United States of America managed to survive for over 200 years without the Chevron doctrine. I think we'll be ok.

Judges are not going to "set policy." They will simply review whether or not the policy proposed by the Administration is consistent with the law, without special deference to the opinion of the agency. Ruling on whether something is legal is what Courts do. [/quote]

Chevron was decided because companies were dealing with vague laws across 50 states and needed clarity. Corporations actually asked for Chevron because it would enable better compliance with the law and unleash economic productivity instead of hiring armies of lawyers to deal with conflicting laws and conflicting rulings with judges in different circuits. In short, Chevron is about economic efficiency. Chevron was good because it created some semblance of consistency across the country.

The Supreme Court - by striking down Chevron - just created a massive stimulus program for lawyers. Legal stimmies, if you will. [/quote]

Again, look at what was going on in Reagan's administration, for example Anne Gorsuch's heading of EPA under Reagan and the extreme deregulation agenda she pursued.  It generated a massive backlash and extreme distrust of companies, to the point where big corporations went to Reagan and begged for her to be replaced.  Reagan ultimately brought Ruckelshaus, who was EPA's very first Administrator back to set the EPA back [b]on a better regulatory path.[/b][/quote]

AFUERA!![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics