Reply to Why do rich women pay lots of money to deform their faces to look like this?

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "Why do rich women pay lots of money to deform their faces to look like this?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Man that is so sad to see. She was always so beautiful![/quote]

She’s ALWAYS had a ton of work done. You liked it until you didn’t. [/quote]

She had a lot of work done in 1997?  I don't think so.

I don't even recognize this Gwen.

[img]https://www.rollingstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/rs-110406-302b4beb760085cac3ba4e5fdf6b25359132e144.jpg?w=358[/img]

- new poster who agrees she [b]was[/b] beautiful and insanely cool[/quote]

She's 53. Of course she was cute and skinny in her 20s and very early 30s.[/quote]

53 is not that old. Plenty of normal people still look great in the 50s.[/quote]

Jennifer Anniston and Reese Witherspoon look as good as ever on the morning show.  They've been more judicious in any work they've had done.  [/quote]

Reece was 46 when she filmed this last season of the show. Agree she looks great but she’s still on the younger side. I’m curious to see how she handles the next 10 years.

Kate Winslet has spoken out against having stuff done - she looks her age but good.

I saw katie couric, mid 60s, on the today Show recently being interviewed for her cancer work and she looked amazing. It look like she had work done but really well. But I follow her on Instagram and she sometimes post without any make up, and she looks her age. I’m sure Katie has done something but it seems minimal. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics