Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Jealous of Big Law partner spouses?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think what you’re seeing here are spouses who’s married to biglaw and fall into 2 camps… 1 happy marriages, 2 unhappy marriages. The happy marriages find a way to maximize time at home and the unhappy marriages the biglaw partner throws in more and more time at work for possibly diminishing returns because it’s more palatable than being at home. This is supported by the claims of better work/life balance being accompanied by less unpleasant posters and the claims of bad work/life balance being accompanied by bitter, accusatory, suspicious, and unpleasant posters. It all seems to align.[/quote] Not even close. My husband is very happy at home and miserable at work. We are saving FU money as fast as we possibly can. It think it’s the more materlistic/less materialistic divide. They happy wives are willing to up with anything just for the giant paycheck. Even if it’s “easy street” now, they didn’t get there on easy street. [/quote] Yea, I'm the PP with a big law spouse but who also works. Reading this thread was fascinating. I think the people who think it's worth it can't make their own money.[/quote] Double Biglaw for over a decade (he made partner I made counsel). I don’t understand what you’re getting at. Of course having so much money you never have to think about it is worth a lot of BS. [/quote] Ah, but you actually wanted biglaw - people who 'make' counsel basically wanted partner but didn't get it. By the way, I was biglaw too until I jumped ship - I was the associate you all hated because I was super smart, super good, and also super jack@$$-y about the fact that I wouldn't work for partners who didn't go to Ivies. I also memorized all of the associates published hours so I could tell you which dummy to bother instead of me who wasn't hitting their billables.[/quote] You sound like a badass. And what are you doing now with your Ivy League degree besides bragging on DCUM?[/quote] Making bank at one of those dream in house flex jobs. Because my end goal was never to make partner. It served me well. And to the PP recovering lawyer, what’s your issue? You have to not overwork your star people? Guess what, some of us weren’t in it to cover for white guys who shot the shit and bro-ed out all day.[/quote] “Making bank” in-house? We make the same - let’s not exaggerate. My in-house legal team is paid on the same pay scale and there are [b]no bonuses for your fancy Ivy League degree, no one cares[/b].[/quote] DP here. This is not usually the case - maybe you got lucky, but if you graduated last (or even first) in your bottom of the barrel barely-accredited law school, your options are usually quite limited - especially (especially) compared to ivy educated lawyers. Most every lawyer knows this. [/quote] Another DP. Most lawyers also have basic reading comprehension skills. The PP wasn't saying that lawyers from Ivies don't make more money that people from very low-regarded schools generally. They were saying that in an in-house department, no one cares which people went to an Ivy versus another school. And this is true in my experience, as someone who attended a non-Ivy. There are a very large number of well-respected law school that no one considers "bottom of the barrel barely-accredited." I've never encountered any limitations because I attended a well-regarded public law school instead of an Ivy, and in some settings I think my degree is advantageous compared to one from a place like Cornell or Penn (agree there's always a benefit to Harvard and Yale, especially in academia or at certain firms). In-house departments are largely much less pedigree focused, and at some companies, other factors are much more important (industry experience, for instance).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics