Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Quake reveals day of Jesus' crucifixion, researchers believe"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If a scientist believes that a religious explanation supersedes a scientific explanation of events then that's bad science, not based on data. If a scientist compartmentalizes and uses religion to fill the gaps in our scientific understanding then that's not bad science. Just a person who is uncomfortable with uncertainty and needs “answers” to the unknown. Collins: ”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” [/quote] Who are you, and who is “Collins?” Why should anyone listen to either of you?[/quote] Collins was one of the scientists on the PP’s list. I’m an intelligent person with strong STEM background and critical thinking skills who enjoys discussing various topics. Do you think a scientist in 2023 would accept a religious explanation for a natural phenomenon when a scientific explanation already exists? [/quote] What is your STEM background? Are you actively working as a scientist? [/quote] Multiple degrees in STEM. Not actively working as a scientist. You missed my question: Do you think a scientist in 2023 would accept a religious explanation for a natural phenomenon when a scientific explanation already exists? [/quote] What degrees in STEM? Did you ever do research? Are you published? Did you teach?[/quote] I have been answering your questions in good faith. You continue to ignore mine. Is my question too difficult for you? Do you think a scientist in 2023 would accept a religious explanation for a natural phenomenon when a scientific explanation already exists?[/quote] Answer: I cannot speak for a single scientist, much less every scientist, or any scientist, in the year 2023. I cannot speak for any person but myself. Pew does alot of polls about various issues, perhaps they have a poll about it. You should ask scientists your question. Are you a scientist? [/quote] We do know what Frances Collins, a religious scientist who gets copy-and-pasted on this forum frequently, said: [i]”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” [/i] A little dated, but here is what Pew reported: [img]https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2009/11/Scientists-and-Belief-1.gif[/img] And, interestingly, very few scientists are evangelicals. Probably because they have a more difficult time compartmentalizing. [img]https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2009/11/Scientists-and-Belief-2.png[/img][/quote] Bump for % of scientists who believe in god. ^^ [/quote] Which is low compared to the general public[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics