Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Frugal Mama article in today's Washington Post"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=oakland]1. The lack of basic logic skills on display in this thread is breathtaking. Words have meanings. "Frugal" has a meaning. The American Heritage Dictionary defines it as "Practicing or marked by economy, as in the expenditure of money or the use of material resources." The word "economy" is defined as "careful, thrifty management of resources, such as money, materials, or labor." So, let's recap: Does "frugal" mean "impoverished"? NO. Does "frugal" mean "has a household income in the bottom 50% of a given society"? NO. Does being affluent disqualify a person from being frugal? NO. Does "frugal" mean "never, ever buys expensive, non-essential things"? NO. The foregoing is not a matter of opinion; it is, if words have meaning, fact. 2. I wonder if the critics of Amy Suardi consider themselves liberal (as I do, and as I think most DC residents do), because one of the bedrock principles of liberalism is that before reaching conclusions or making judgments, we should ascertain the facts. We know NOTHING about the Suardi family's past financial situation, current household income, or future prospects. To make judgments, in spite of our total ignorance of her situation, about her personal choices and whether or not they should be deemed "frugal" is illiberal in the extreme. 3. The critics have totally ignored what is obviously one of Amy's most important and explicit points: that living frugally is something ASPIRATIONAL. It's something that we aim to do but don't always succeed in doing. So she bought a $1,000 table--is anyone seriously making the argument that that single purchase disqualifies her from presenting herself as frugal? That's like saying "You can't have a blog about nutrition because you ate french fries last week." Furthermore, you can always be *more* frugal. Not being as frugal as you could be doesn't mean you're not frugal. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics