Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "ludlow-taylor"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I suspect that this PP is right. But then with halfway decent school buildings/locations in v. short supply (just ask the Two Rivers crowd), particularly on the Hill, SWS might lack a more appealing option than LT in 2 years time. I wouldn't rule out Van Ness for SWS - the influential Capitol Quarter developers have their ways, with another giant townhouse development breaking ground just south of the highway off NJ Ave. shortly. [/quote] That's been most of the talk to date, and a number of parties have eyes on Van Ness. SWS plans on increasing enrollment to 16 classes of 350 by SY16-17 (including PS3). The SWS/CQ marriage makes a lot of sense and it's the rumor with the most juice. SWS will not co-locate. They'll lose many of the families they've retained for the upcoming move. Co-locating brings its own unique set of issues regarding funding and for SWS it was a major driver in going independent in the first place. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
