Reply to So what kind of King will Charles be?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "So what kind of King will Charles be?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Charles is going to be terrible. It’s a shame because I think he is much more competent and intelligent than his sons. But his people skills are terrible and he has already gotten in trouble for being political with those letters mentioning Israel. [/quote]

How so?

The sons seem way more emotionally intelligent, socially skilled and articulate to me  in what ways do you think they they lack intelligence and competence?[/quote]

Charles is better educated, more intelligent, hardworking and shrewd businessman than his sons. You are right that he has little self awareness, but he is basically the poster boy for complex childhood trauma and attachment issues. There is a picture of his parents returning from an extended tour shaking little Charles hand, as the queen then goes on to embraces her mother. Heartbreaking and humiliating for a young boy to experience.

I think he will be an eccentric king and will do things his way.[/quote]

Lot of upper class twits mess it up … sometimes I think being born into great advantage can be a great disadvantage - exhibit A: King Charles III

Ok thanks … so much of the lead royal job seems to be pageantry PR, social skills and appealing character  - William definitely seems better suited to it EQ wise.

To your point though, capacity for intellectual intelligence is allegedly passed down through the mother (according to science I have read). I wonder whether Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was markedly more intelligent than Princess Diana? That would be a wonder given royal inbreeding….

[/quote]
Diana was intelligent?[/quote]

I don't think either were intelligent. Elizabeth apparently also felt uneducated and a bit dull when young. I think she grew into her role brilliantly, but I don't think she was particularly intellectually blessed. None of them are. Diana was maybe slightly more self aware to know she was "thick" in the head. This is not a family that bred for intelligence or looks really.[/quote]

“Not bred for intelligence or looks” makes them sound like racehorses bred to sit in the stables …

They can’t be that thick since they both managed to build savvy royal careers and great wealth … [/quote]

Easy to make a home run when you’re born on third base. [/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics