Reply to Bridgerton, Season 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Bridgerton, Season 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I LOVED Season 2! I liked the unusual angle, I liked both the main characters. I thought their chemistry was much better than Daphne and what’s his name. Those two were so awkward to watch. Season 2 was light, fun, sexy and addicting. [/quote]

Ewwww. There was no chemistry. Season 2 was dreadful. Daphne and Simon were loads sexier and more fun. [b]Kate and Anthony were just an awful combo. Even looked bad together[/b]. [/quote]

+1 I said this before the season even started. Kate doesn’t match with Anthony at all. Horrible casting.[/quote]

What are you people talking about? How should they “match?” They’re two hot young people. They look great together. I don’t find the romance compelling but it’s not because of how they look. [/quote]

I agree, and think they matched just fine.[/quote]

Eh, they don't look good together. She is broader in the shoulders then he is. He is too tiny for her. [/quote]

Yes! She looks like a horse![/quote]

+1 Horse face.[/quote]

How? Sarah Jessica Parker has horseface not this lady. [/quote]

Her nose I doesn’t match her face. She needs a nose job.[/quote]

Omg are these real thoughts that real people have? Earnestly  enough to write them down and post them on the internet?[/quote]

I agree the comments are a half step away from being racist. None of the guys are really hot other than from the first season but where are the comments about them?[/quote]

Totally. That comment about how they should have chosen Pryanka Chopra instead because she’s more “classically attractive”… how do you not interpret that comment as “they should have case an actress who looked closer to White?” I suppose it could just be a coincidence that they picked an Indian actress who could pass for white, but goodness. [/quote]

DP.  You people sound absurd.  Pryanka Chopra is a beautiful Indian woman - she doesn't look white at all!  I understood what that poster was saying.  You simply want to call out racism where none exists - and it's beyond tiresome.[/quote]

Pryanka is indeed a beautiful Indian woman. She is a light-skin Indian woman with white features (some via plastic surgery). It’s as though she was a white woman dipped in caramel. The actress who played Kate in Bridgetown is also a beautiful Indian woman who is dark skin, but some people cannot see her beauty because they cannot get beyond her complexion.  Apparently the original poster who mentioned Pryanka does not believe dark skin Indians are beautiful and should be represented. Unfortunately, the Lighter skin of every race is more aesthetically preferable to white people  and even many Indians. And that my dear is bull shit and racist. [/quote]

I was the person who called out the “classical beauty” comment as a little suspect, but after that posters “big head” comment I’m actually convinced I was off base! Same with the Idris Elba fan.

But people who say “ugh it’s always race with you social justice warrior comments” seem a little too defensive about being questioned on their prejudice. I don’t know their hearts or their actions but they should realize that yes, sometimes we white people have unconscious bias and sometimes it really is about race. [/quote]

Thank you for the last paragraph ❤️[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics