Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In Mississippi

9 children have died due to COVID

3,194 children died by abortion in 2019

Imagine if not having an abortion was a condition to employment for the sake of saving childrens lives there.

I just don't see the synthesis of the logic used in support of abortion except for being real honest with ourselves and admitting ok, 99% of time, it's a convenience thing and it's not about right to privacy in our bodies, it's not about saving lives.  It's convenience.  It's birth control.  Be honest with yourselves

[/quote]

0 children died from abortion. You cannot abort a child. Nice try but WRONG.[/quote]

You deny science then.  There's no magic when what is inside the uterus comes out of it.  It doesn't magically transform into a baby like a sci fi movie.  It's not a changling. [/quote]
The “magic” is when it goes from needing the mother’s body to survive vs. not.[/quote]

Okay, true it needs the mother to survive for probably at least 24 weeks usually, but it's still a baby growing.  Not a tadpole or widget.  It's a person.[/quote]
It’s rights do not supersede that of the woman carrying it. That’s the point, genius bar. Republicans believe women are secondary considerations to the contents of their uterus (or the contents of their Fallopian tubes; remember that ghoul moron Republican who believed the forced birth pseudo science that ectopic pregnancies can be transplanted? They can’t.).

What we’re seeing here is the GOP’s indefensible cruelty to women, their control fetish and their lust for a miserable country. They’re the same goons who would happily take away medical insurance - the abortions past this point are almost exclusively for fetal malformations that a woman has decided she can’t care for. What’s going to happened to the children born whose families can’t care for them? What’s the “beautiful choice” there? Bankrupting families? Divorces? You forced birthers are just in a morally indefensible position. Yours is the point of extreme cruelty. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics