Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "What’s up with parents not wearing masks at the playground?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Masks are only recommended outside when 6’ of distance can’t be maintained. It’s fine. Really. [/quote] Not true. Even for fully vaccinated people CDC recommends to: "continue to wear masks [b]and[/b] stay 6 feet apart from other people in other settings, like when they are in public or visiting with unvaccinated people from multiple households.[/quote] Not sure why the CDC guidelines are gospel for so many. The six feet rule is baloney. “The exact origins of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s six-foot social distancing guideline are unclear, according to Lindsey Marr, an expert on viral transmission and professor at Virginia Tech. “It’s almost like it was pulled out of thin air,” Marr told the New York Times.” / https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/cdc-six-foot-school-distancing-181926895.html [/quote] that’s interesting because this same researcher from VA Tech is quoted in an August WAPO article saying: “I think six feet is a fine number, but we need to convey that this is a starting point,” said Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech civil and environmental engineering professor, who has studied airborne viruses and was not involved with the BMJ report. “Beyond six feet doesn’t mean there’s zero risk.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/08/27/coronavirus-social-distancing-6-feet/ It was the same article with the study that mentioned this: The conventional wisdom behind six-foot separations originated from research by a German biologist, Carl Flügge, who in the late 1800s suggested that was as far as microbe-containing droplets could travel. Unfortunately, his hypothesis missed farther-flung particles invisible to the naked eye — in particular, the tiny gobs of bodily fluid and virus that float on the air as aerosols. came up with this chart from a study that talked about risk of transmission in different settings. [img]https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/ZI45GQV3TFD5XBOE7DZ3UDOWDE.jpg&w=916[/img][/quote] Thank you! This is a great chart.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics