Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "December 17 - TJ decision?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]At the end of the day only 3% of FCPS high school students will attend TJ. FCPS is committing to an awful lot of additional process to make sure the “right” (qualified yet diverse) kids end up there - they will have need an expanded admissions office with legal counsel watching their every move - while other high and secondary schools are largely ignored or left to function on auto-pilot. It is a very large investment in “redefining merit.” They run a significant risk that, as more UMC families grow dissatisfied with FCPS’s priorities, they’ll just leave for less stressful - and stressed - systems such as APS and LCPS. [/quote] This is why TJ should just be closed and changed to an academy. There are almost NO CLASSES taken during freshman or sophomore year that aren’t offered at the base high schools. [/quote] Yes, but I'm pretty sure they are more challenging and deeper than their base school counterpart. Otherwise almost all the TJ kids would be bored and yawning in them. And if there was no TJ, these same kids would be bored and yawning at their local high schools. [/quote] Oh, please. You just tell yourself this to defend a status quo that has now been squarely rejected. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics